Click here to let us help you today.           

    Home
    Mesothelioma Treatment
    Mesothelioma Information
    Mesothelioma Research
    Clinical Trials
    Mesothelioma Stages
    TYPES
    Peritoneal Mesothelioma
    Plural Mesothelioma
    Pericardial Mesothelioma
    Malignant Mesothelioma
    Benign Mesothelioma
    Symptoms
    Asbestosis
    HELP CENTER
   

Legal Help Center

    Treatment Centers
    Mesothelioma Survivors
    RESOURCES
   

M.D. Anderson

   

Sloan Kettering

    Nat. Library of Medicine
    Cancer Information
    M.A.R.F.
    Contact Us

Mesothelioma Research

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Apr;172(4):1039-47.Related Articles

Staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma: comparison of CT and MR imaging.

 

Heelan RT, Rusch VW, Begg CB, Panicek DM, Caravelli JF, Eisen C.

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.

OBJECTIVE: This article compares the accuracy of CT with that of MR imaging in staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled in a prospective staging protocol based on the International Mesothelioma Interest Group staging system. Sixty-five patients underwent CT and MR imaging and a surgical procedure (excluding percutaneous needle biopsy) to stage and resect the tumor. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. CT and MR scans were interpreted independently by observers who were unaware of the results of the other imaging study; these imaging findings were compared with the results of surgery and pathologic examination. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for eight of 10 features revealed by imaging showed no statistically significant differences between CT and MR imaging. However, MR imaging was superior to CT in revealing invasion of the diaphragm (A(z) = .55 for CT versus .82 for MR imaging) and in revealing invasion of endothoracic fascia or solitary resectable foci of chest wall invasion (A(z) = .46 for CT; A(z) = .69 for MR imaging). Several anatomic regions could not be evaluated because positive findings at surgery were rare. CONCLUSION: CT and MR imaging are of nearly equivalent diagnostic accuracy in staging malignant pleural mesothelioma. MR imaging is superior to CT in revealing solitary foci of chest wall invasion and endothoracic fascia involvement and in showing diaphragmatic muscle invasion; however, this advantage does not affect surgical treatment. For cost reasons, CT should be considered the standard diagnostic study before therapy.
 

 

 
 

 

Home  l  Mesothelioma Treatment  l  Mesothelioma Information  l  Mesothelioma Research  l  Mesothelioma Clinical Trials

Stages of Mesothelioma  l  Peritoneal Mesothelioma  l  Plural Mesothelioma  l  Pericardial Mesothelioma  l  Malignant Mesothelioma

Benign Mesothelioma  l  Symptoms of Mesothelioma  l  About Asbestosis  l  Contact Us

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved.

Justcancer.org Inc.